Want to try a fasting diet? Here is everything you need to know
- 5 Minutes Read
- Oct 5, 2019
There's a lot of interest in variations on fasting for weight loss. What does research say about the effectiveness of fasting diet plans? And most importantly, can a fasting plan fit into your lifestyle?
It's the next new thing in diets, or an old thing with a techno-sounding name. It refers to the study of how our circadian clock affects metabolism, and how food intake works with circadian rhythms. Animals eat according to circadian rhythms, but research into the impact on humans -- if any -- is lacking.
So-called intermittent fasting is one variation that's been popular for a few years. There are two ways to follow this diet:
1. Fast for 2 days a week (eat no more than 25% of your daily calorie requirement); eat normally on the other 5 days.
2. Fast on alternate days (say, Monday-Wednesday-Friday); eat normally on the other days.
So far, research hasn't shown that this diet is more effective than simple calorie restricted diets in the long run. Weight loss is not significantly different when compared to subjects on standard calorie restriction. The other catch is that intermittent fasting plans, which call for 2-3 days a week of fasting (or eating very little), are hard to maintain for long. Studies have high drop-out rates. Nevertheless, some people who can stick to this type of plan have success with weight loss.
Recently, another variation on fasting has gotten attention: time-restricted eating. It's sometimes referred to as a 16:8 fast, because you consume all your food for the day during an 8 hour period and then have nothing except water for the other 16 hours. For example, breakfast at 8am, lunch at 11am, dinner at 5pm. Again, no food or beverage intake during the following 16 hours. It helps that some of this time is spent sleeping. And depending on where you start and stop your 8 hours, this type of plan could work with many daily schedules.
For plenty of people, this much time restriction is very different from their typical eating patterns. If you consume a small or modest breakfast, say at 7:30am (beverages count as food consumption), you might not eat lunch until noon or 1pm, then may eat again anywhere from 3-5pm and have supper later, between 6 and 8 or even later. Your overnight fasting period will be less than 12 hours. If you eat late at night, it's even shorter.
Is this type of plan any better than intermittent fasting or calorie restriction? Research has some interesting results. Consider a small 2018 study.
Another study that involved trained male athletes had similar results. Again, food intake was not restricted in amount, but the time-restricted group was expected to consume their 3 daily meals at 1 pm, 4 pm and 8 pm. They fasted for 16 hours. At the end of the 8 week study, the highly trained male athletes in the time-restricted group had lost 16% of their fat mass, despite keeping up their calorie intake. Lean body mass did not change significantly. They also had lower blood sugar and insulin levels.
In another study, 23 obese subjects adopted a 16:8 style eating plan for 12 weeks. They were not told to restrict food intake, but were asked to consume all food for the day between 10am and 6pm. Calorie intake decreased by an average of 350/day, from almost 1700/day at the start to 1330 calories/day at 12 weeks. Body weight decreased by an average of almost 3%, from an average of 210 lbs to 202. So they lost an average of 8 lbs over 12 weeks, or about 1-1/2 lbs/week. You might not see this as a dramatic result. The interesting point is that they were not told to restrict calories. For some reason, the 16:8 diet led them to spontaneously eat slightly fewer calories. As with the athletes in the above study, these obese subjects lost fat mass but not lean body mass.
Why would restriction of food intake to a controlled time period each day affect metabolism? There are many theories, but no definite answers. Researchers speculate that a prolonged fast during each 24 hour period resets hormones to favor fat burning, and that the digestive system can reset during that period. Combining a time-restricted eating schedule with a reduction in calorie intake might be effective for weight loss. Or a time-restricted eating pattern might be an effective long term plan to maintain weight loss. Bottom line: More and larger quality studies are needed!
Let's consider an even older spin on chrononutrition: "Breakfast like a King, Lunch like a Prince, Dine like a Pauper." This advice has been around for decades, and the quote is attributed to Adelle Davis, a nutritionist who wrote several popular books about nutrition and health in the mid-20th Century. A recent study of 93 obese women examined the effect of this type of eating pattern on weight loss. The women were put on 1400 calorie diets and divided into 2 groups:
After 12 weeks on the diet, both groups lost weight, but the Breakfast Like A King group lost 2.5 times more weight than the other group: an average of almost 20 lbs lost versus 8 for the Big Dinner group. The Breakfast like a King group also had significantly lower blood fat, sugar, and insulin levels. Bottom line: shifting calorie intake to earlier in the day is an effective weight loss strategy.
Unfortunately, the demands of work, commuting and family life don't leave time for a big breakfast every morning. Breakfast is typically a small or non-existent meal. We like to wind down later with a nice evening meal and perhaps snack later as well.
I'm encouraged by the possibilities these different studies have uncovered. You can incorporate aspects of each one into your weight loss plan, with room for flexibility.
Originally published on 9 October 2018
Updated: October 3, 2019