Diet App Scorecard June 2026: What Users Actually Say About Calorie Apps

Sergey Oreshko - Co-founder and CEO of MyNetDiary

June 2026's Diet App Scorecard analyzes 1,379 filtered US App Store reviews across ten calorie tracking apps, recalculating each app's rating from that month's written reviews only. MacroFactor (4.47), Calo (4.45), and MyNetDiary (4.40) topped the table, MyNetDiary's first month outside the top two, while billing complaints (post-cancellation charges, denied refunds, and third-party payment processors) were the loudest cross-app trust signal.

June was a turbulent month for calorie tracking app reviews. The Diet App Scorecard analyzed 1,379 filtered US App Store reviews across ten calorie and food tracking apps ranked in the top 100 Health & Fitness category as of June 30, 2026, and for the second month running, the top of the ratings table looks different from the one the App Store's star ratings would predict. As the CEO of MyNetDiary, I review user feedback across all major calorie tracking apps monthly to understand what users value and where the category falls short.

You would see almost none of this on the App Store itself. The displayed star rating is an all-time average that can span a decade of versions. The auto-generated Review Summary skews positive even when a month's reviews run negative, MyFitnessPal's stayed upbeat in June while roughly 65% of its filtered reviews were one or two stars. And the default "Most Helpful" sorting surfaces reviews that are often years old. The scorecard recalculates each app's rating from the current month's written reviews only, using the published methodology applied identically to every app, including mine. (To run the five-minute version yourself, see How to Find the Best Calorie Tracker App.)

Two patterns defined June. First, accuracy complaints concentrated in apps that lean on AI photo estimation as the primary logging method, reviewers described chicken identified as potato chips, a 60-calorie tortilla logged at over 2,000 calories, and barcode scans that contradicted the label, while complaints about database-backed apps centered on coverage gaps rather than wholesale misreads. Second, billing became the month's loudest trust signal, and not only for the usual suspects. Both are covered below.

June 2026 ranking, highest to lowest: MacroFactor 4.47, Calo 4.45, MyNetDiary 4.40, Cronometer 3.88, Lose It! 3.47, BitePal 3.17, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker Municorn 2.88, FoodPilot 2.83, Cal AI 2.42, MyFitnessPal 2.23. These are monthly review ratings recalculated after filtering, not the all-time star ratings the App Store displays.

Ratings at a Glance

The chart below shows each app's average June review rating after filtering, ordered by download rank, the order used throughout this scorecard. Rank and rating tell different stories this month: the two most-downloaded apps in the group posted the two lowest ratings.

What Users Said About Cal AI in June 2026

• Average rating: 2.42 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 125
• Filtered: 7 random/unrelated reviews

Reviews skew heavily negative. The largest complaint cluster involves discovering, after a long onboarding questionnaire, that the app requires a paid subscription; many call the "free" positioning misleading. Billing grievances follow closely: charges after cancellation, denied refunds, subscriptions locked to a single device, lost premium access, and unresponsive, AI-only support, with "scam" recurring across one-star reviews. Users also report inaccurate photo and barcode results, failure to write data to Apple Health, and freezing. Satisfied reviewers praise fast photo-based logging and meaningful weight loss, including several multi-month success stories. Several five-star ratings were submitted before meaningful use, and one reviewer describes a rating prompt during onboarding, a pattern worth monitoring, though most reviews read as organic.

What Users Said About MyFitnessPal in June 2026

• Average rating: 2.23 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 362
• Filtered: 6 random/unrelated reviews

Reviews are dominated by backlash to the spring redesign, now months old and still the leading complaint: logging requires more taps, the daily diary is no longer visible at a glance, food lists jump while logging, and individual copy/paste was removed. Long-time users, including decade-plus premium subscribers, describe canceling or switching apps. Reliability complaints compound it: slow loading, freezes, forced logouts, lost accounts and data, and battery drain. Others cite ads, the paywalled barcode scanner, goals that reset themselves, and divisive snarky notifications a few reviewers love. Positives center on the extensive food database, years of weight-loss and diabetes carb-counting success, responsive developer replies, and scattered praise for the new interface. Review patterns appear organic.

What Users Said About Cronometer in June 2026

• Average rating: 3.88 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 109
• Filtered: 1 random/unrelated review

Sentiment runs solidly positive. Reviewers repeatedly praise micronutrient depth they say few trackers match, a generous free tier that keeps barcode scanning free, and responsive support that corrects food-label errors quickly; several switchers from MyFitnessPal and Fitbit say they are happier here, and multiple reviewers report substantial weight loss. Two complaint threads stand out: free-tier ads have grown intrusive and sometimes malfunction, freezing the app or refusing to close, and a recent search update buries generic whole foods under branded results while breaking recently-used lists. Smaller gripes include a learning curve, occasional black-screen glitches, and database gaps for raw and international foods. Review patterns appear organic, with detailed, mixed feedback throughout.

What Users Said About Calorie Counter & Food Tracker Municorn in June 2026

• Average rating: 2.88 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 49
• Filtered: 2 random/unrelated reviews

Feedback splits sharply between brief praise and detailed frustration. Critics describe completing a lengthy onboarding questionnaire only to hit a mandatory subscription, and several report refund requests denied after the app misread foods, logged incorrect calorie or protein values, or would not let them edit entries and workouts. Bugs, pricing complaints, and wording one user found insulting round out the negatives. Positive reviews are mostly short, citing simplicity, photo-based logging, and a clean interface, with one reviewer reporting a 25-pound loss. The rating distribution is strongly bimodal, generic five-star one-liners are frequent, one reviewer says the app requested a rating before they had begun using it, and another questions the authenticity of existing reviews, patterns warranting an authenticity flag.

What Users Said About MyNetDiary in June 2026

• Average rating: 4.40 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 183
• Filtered: 3 random/unrelated reviews

Reviews are strongly positive. Ease of use is the most frequent praise, followed by a free tier reviewers call unusually generous, with free barcode scanning cited often. Weight-loss stories are numerous and specific, several exceeding 100 pounds, and multiple users arrived on recommendations from dietitians, doctors, or family; switchers from Fitbit, Noom, and Weight Watchers report smooth transitions. Meal Scan draws praise for accuracy, though some resent its paywall. Criticism is scattered: a handful of billing complaints, charges after cancellation, an unwanted annual upgrade, a renewal lockout, plus persistent premium upsell popups that annoy even paying subscribers, occasional database and usability quibbles, and requests to view the full day on one screen. Patterns appear organic.

What Users Said About Lose It! in June 2026

• Average rating: 3.47 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 188
• Filtered: 1 random/unrelated review

Sentiment is genuinely split. Loyal users, many tracking for a decade or more, credit the app for major weight loss, several cite 50 to 110 pounds, and praise easy logging, a deep restaurant database, and support that patched a mid-June crash within days. The dominant complaint is monetization: barcode scanning and now macro breakdowns sit behind the paywall, and ad frequency has escalated to video ads after nearly every action, with GLP-1 promotions drawing particular resentment and some premium and lifetime subscribers reporting ads anyway. Additional friction includes cancellation difficulties and surprise charges, database entries with inaccurate values, a lengthy onboarding questionnaire, and lag when browsing history. Review patterns appear organic, with detailed accounts on both sides.

What Users Said About AI Calorie Tracker: FoodPilot in June 2026

• Average rating: 2.83 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 6
• Filtered: 0 random/unrelated reviews

Only six reviews qualified for analysis this month, so findings are directional at best. Sentiment divides evenly. Positive reviewers highlight photo-based logging as the core appeal, saying snapping a meal photo is far less time-consuming than manual entry and helps them log consistently, especially away from home without nutrition labels. Negative reviewers attack the same feature from the other side: photos repeatedly fail to identify foods, barcode scans miss common items like grapes and blueberries, and one user says manual entry is not available as a fallback. Two reviewers also object that the app is paid despite a free listing. The sample is too small for meaningful authenticity assessment, though nothing in it appears suspicious.

What Users Said About MacroFactor in June 2026

• Average rating: 4.47 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 66
• Filtered: 1 random/unrelated review

Praise is near-uniform and unusually detailed. Reviewers single out the adaptive algorithm that recalculates expenditure and targets from logged weight, calling it the closest thing to a coach, alongside fast logging, a clean interface, and photo estimation several peg at 80–90% accuracy. Personal trainers and nutrition coaches say they recommend it to clients, and weight-loss reports run as high as 82 pounds. Some reviewers mention arriving through fitness YouTubers. The few negatives are pointed: the app is subscription-only with no free version, a handful of detailed reports dispute database accuracy on branded items and nutrients like omega-3s and describe dismissive support responses, and one user found calorie adjustments too aggressive. Patterns appear organic despite the lopsided distribution.

What Users Said About Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter in June 2026

• Average rating: 4.45 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 117
• Filtered: 1 random/unrelated review

Reviews are heavily favorable and center on effortlessness: reviewers say photographing a plate or scanning a barcode is the fastest logging method they have tried, and many describe the estimates as surprisingly accurate. Accountability and habit-building come up often, with weight-loss reports of 11 to 23 pounds over weeks. A smaller set of critics report the opposite accuracy experience, the same meal returning different counts, barcode misreads, and an inflated sodium total, plus database gaps, a workout backdating glitch, and requests for fiber tracking. Billing draws the sharpest anger: trials charged immediately or at full-year rates, and refunds refused. Brief, generic five-star one-liners remain an elevated share worth monitoring, though without duplicated text or same-day clustering; other reviews appear organic.

What Users Said About BitePal in June 2026

• Average rating: 3.17 / 5
• Reviews analyzed: 174
• Filtered: 1 random/unrelated review

Reviews split sharply. Fans love the virtual raccoon: gamified feeding, rewards, and reminders that several reviewers, including self-described ADHD users, say finally made tracking stick, alongside free photo-based logging. Detractors report AI estimates wildly off, chicken identified as potato chips, calories at double or half of label values, and macros recently moved behind a paywall, with further add-ons layered on top. The most serious cluster is billing: recurring charges after cancellation, unreachable support, and payments routed through third-party processors outside Apple's subscription system, with "scam" appearing throughout one-star reviews. A few reviewers warn the streak mechanics and judgmental tone could encourage restrictive eating. The bimodal distribution, a run of five-star ratings within the first days of use, and one reviewer's suspicion of review farming warrant an authenticity flag.

Diet App Scorecard: June 2026 at a Glance

All ten apps side by side, in download ranking order. The rating shown is each app's monthly review rating recalculated after filtering, not the all-time star rating the App Store displays. App selection as of June 30, 2026.

# = download ranking in the top 100 Health & Fitness category, US App Store, June 30, 2026. Source: US App Store reviews. †FoodPilot's chart position pending confirmation. *Calo: elevated share of brief, generic five-star reviews; monitoring, see summary above.

Scorecard Trends to Watch: Who Actually Has Your Card on File?

Every month one theme rises out of the reviews, and in June it was billing, specifically, the difference between apps that bill through Apple's subscription system and apps that route payments through third-party processors. BitePal reviewers described charges continuing months after cancellation, subscriptions that never appear in Apple's subscription manager, and payment descriptors referencing the processor Paddle (one reviewer wrote "Peddle") and an entity labeled "Resurfacing Lithuania." When a subscription doesn't live in Apple's system, the cancel button users know how to find doesn't exist, and June's one-star reviews show what happens next: bank disputes, locked cards, and the word "scam" repeated across dozens of reviews.

BitePal was the extreme case, not the only one. Cal AI reviewers reported denied refunds, a subscription locked to a single device, and support that stopped responding. Municorn reviewers described refund requests bounced to Apple and denied. Calo's sharpest complaints involved trials charged immediately or at full-year rates. Even Lose It!, which bills through the App Store, drew cancellation-difficulty complaints. And in the interest of the transparency this series is built on: MyNetDiary logged its first billing complaints in the scorecard's history, a reviewer charged for an annual plan after choosing monthly, two who reported charges after cancellation, and one who expected a renewal reminder that never came. Five complaints in 183 reviews is a different order of problem from what BitePal users describe, but it is not zero, and it was not zero this month.

The authenticity picture shifted too. May's concerns covered Cal AI, BitePal, and Calo, see the May 2026 scorecard. In June, BitePal's bimodal pattern persisted, detailed one-star billing complaints alongside a run of five-star ratings posted within the first days of use, and Municorn returned to flagged status with a strongly bimodal distribution and a reviewer reporting a rating prompt before they had begun using the app. Calo stays on the watch list: no duplicated text this month, but brief generic five-star entries remained elevated, and the "day 76" milestone phrasing first flagged in May appeared again. Cal AI improved to a monitoring note.

Credit where the reviews give it: MacroFactor's top rating rests on unusually detailed praise for its adaptive calorie algorithm, which recalculates targets from logged weight, the closest thing to a coach that reviewers describe anywhere in this category. And Lose It!'s support team earned rare public thanks for patching a mid-June crash within days, with named staff responses appearing in reviews. In a category where users hand over both their health data and their credit card, June's reviews suggest people increasingly judge the billing experience as part of the product itself. The apps that treat it that way are the ones whose one-star pages stay quiet.

Also available as www.plateai.com